
“Oscillion 45” - Ben F. Laposky
One of my favorite things about the Internet in 2012 is how easy it makes to crate-dig. I mean crate-digging in the general sense here, not necessarily only records, but the act that in Real Life involves colonizing the back of a thrift shop (or suburban yard sale, or obscure flea market) for too many hours and emerging, covered in dust and holding a gem.
There are some well-trod paths here (Ubuweb or Tumblr for that matter), and some not so well-trod. One of my favorites, I tracked down a while back from a mention on Tom Moody’s blog of “the Sievers Syllabus.”
The Sievers Syllabus turned out to be Beau Sievers’s syllabus for a class he taught several years back called “Irony and Utopia: History of Computer Art”. This was the gift that kept on giving: aside from an approximate ton of primary source PDFs, there was a link to Edward Zajec’s artist statement, originally published in a 1976 book called Artist and Computer and there for the reading.
Editor Ruth Leavitt asked a good-sized selection of contemporary artists whose work involved computers to answer some questions, including “How/why did you become involved with the computer (in producing art)?”, “What role does the computer play for you…simulation, tool, etc.? What is your role?” and “Could your work be done without the aid of a computer? If yes, why use the computer?” Some answered the questions, most didn’t. A lot of the themes seem archaic now, others almost too relevant to the current state of generative aesthetics, software abstraction, creative code or whatever it is that you want to call the work being done now that is descended from the work in “Artist and Computer.”
Some images:
“Claustrophobia” - Aldo Giorgini and W.C. Chen


Vicky Chaet

“HE7 gc/gf” - Jacques Palumbo

Manfred Mohr